- In today's edition of pointless political data, Asset Sales vs. Anti-Smacking Referendum by electorate:
- Almost 350,000 more people voted in the anti-smacking referendum than the asset sales referendum.
- As observed by @rawiniathompson, "Yes" average of Maori electorates is 27% lower than general electorates #AssetSales
- In more pointless political data, percentage turnout between Asset Sales and Anti-Smacking Referendum by electorate:
- More people voted in the anti-smacking referendum than the #AssetSales referendum in every electorate except for Wellington Central.
- Additionally, the % of informal votes has halved between the anti-smacking and #AssetSales referenda, meaning absolutely nothing.
- Adding all the digits in the number of votes counted in the preliminary result equals 22, indicating a clear mandate to stahp #AssetSales
- Coromandel wins the award for highest prime number of votes received in the #AssetSales referendum.
- Two electorates had more Yes votes than No votes in the #AssetSales referendum: Epsom and Tāmaki.
- The largest #AssetSales vote differential was in Dunedin South with 12,985. Unfortunately, it's not a prime number so the votes don't count.
- Wellington Central also had the most Invalid Votes! Clearly a sign that the OCR should be raised.
- Most important statistic of the night: the #AssetSales referendum cost roughly $6.75 per vote collected.
- Actually to be accurate, 29.5% of (eligible to vote) kiwis voted against asset sales. (as opposed to the 67% that was actively being quoted)
- Back to pointless statistics: Xero's stock price has increased 25x inbetween the anti-smacking and #StateAssets #Referendum
- Last one: number of votes collected in the electorate is perfectly divisible by the number of letters in the name of 9 electorates.
No comments:
Post a Comment